Skip to main content
Log in

Decentralized Coordination Control for a Network of Mobile Robotic Sensors

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A decentralized control approach is presented for a network of robotic sensors to achieve the global coordination: group aggregation or consensus flocking. Each robotic sensor obeys three local interaction rules: group cohesion, collision avoidance and velocity alignment. Accordingly, the resultant control law for each robotic sensor is composed of three associated control components. The cohesion control component is based on geometry and additionally enables maintaining initial interconnection of network. The alignment control component ensures that all members in an interconnected network eventually reach to a common velocity. The control component for collision avoidance among members, as a passive role, is embedded in cohesion control. Simulation results demonstrate the capability of the proposed control approach in achieving the coordination behaviour with an initially interconnected network. However, we observed that an initially non-interconnected network may also achieve the coordination behaviour depending on the initial distribution and velocities. Initial interconnection of a network is only a sufficient but not essential condition for the network to achieve the coordination behaviour for our control approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lopez, U., Gautrais, J., Couzin, I. D., et al. (2012). From behavioural analyses to models of collective motion in fish schools. Interface Focus, 2(6), 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, R. K., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2013). Constrained interaction and coordination in proximity-limited multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 29(4), 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, X., & Chen, H. (2014). An interactive control algorithm used for equilateral triangle formation with robotic sensors. Sensors, 14(4), 7229–7247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezaee, H., & Abdollahi, F. (2014). A decentralized cooperative control scheme with obstacle avoidance for a team of mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimarogonas, D. V. (2012). Sufficient conditions for decentralized potential functions based controllers using canonical vector fields. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(10), 2621–2626.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Brutschy, A., Garattoni, L., Brambilla, M., et al. (2015). The TAM: Abstracting complex tasks in swarm robotics research. Swarm Intelligence, 9(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Casteigts, A., Albert, J., Chaumette, S., et al. (2012). Biconnecting a network of mobile robots using virtual angular forces. Computer Communications, 35, 1038–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner, H. G., Jadbabaie, A., & Pappas, G. J. (2007). Flocking in fixed and switching networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(5), 863–868.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, D. H., Wang, H., & Shin, S. (2006). Decentralized control of autonomous swarm systems using artificial potential function: Analytical design guidelines. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 45(4), 369–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Balch, T., & Arkin, R. C. (1998). Behavior-based formation control for multi-robot teams. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(6), 926–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spears, W. M., Spears, D. F., Hamann, J. C., et al. (2004). Distributed, physics-based control of swarms of vehicles. Autonomous Robots, 17(2–3), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spears, D., Kerr, W., & Spears, W. (2006). Physics-based robot swarms for coverage problems. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, 11(3), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Derr, K., & Manic, M. (2011). Extended virtual spring mesh (evsm): The distributed self-organizing mobile ad hoc network for area exploration. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(12), 5424–5437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Derr, K., & Manic, M. (2013). Adaptive control parameters for dispersal of multi-agent mobile ad hoc network (manet) swarms. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(4), 1900–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ercan, M. F., & Li, X. (2011). Swarm robot flocking: an empirical study research. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 7102, pp. 495–504).

  17. Li, X., & Ercan, M. F. (2016). An algorithm for smallest enclosing circle problem of planar point sets. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 9786, pp. 309–318).

  18. Feng, H., Endrias, D. H., & Taher, M. A. (2013). An accurate and efficient algorithm for determining minimum circumscribed circles and spheres from discrete data points. Computer-Aided Design, 45, 105–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaumont, N., & Adami, C. (2016). Evolution of sustained foraging in three-dimensional environments with physics. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 17(4), 359–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Science Research Foundation of Yulin Normal University (Grant: G2017013) and Singapore Tote Board (Grants: 11- 27801-36-M115 and 11-30012-36-M115).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Ercan, M.F. Decentralized Coordination Control for a Network of Mobile Robotic Sensors. Wireless Pers Commun 102, 2429–2442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5263-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5263-y

Keywords

Navigation