Abstract
Equipped with many advantages, such as low yield strength, low yield ratio, high elongation, severe plastic deformation and good energy dissipation ability, low-yield-point steel is very suitable for use in metal energy dissipation devices. Based on different materials (Q235 steel and low-yield-point steel) and different parabola openings, two types of energy dissipation steel plates underwent different yield displacements and then were assembled into a new open-hole energy dissipation device, which could achieve the goal of two-stage energy dissipation under small and large earthquakes. To obtain the failure modes and energy dissipation mechanism under the low reversed cyclic horizontal loads and observe relevant hysteretic curves and skeleton curves, the new energy dissipation device was studied and analyzed by means of theoretical analysis, experimental research, and numerical simulation analysis. Based on parametric analyses, the effects of the height, thickness and opening coefficient of the steel plate on the energy dissipation ability of the new energy dissipation device were emphasized. Thus, the key parameters affecting the energy dissipation behavior were obtained. Finally, a force-restoring model of the new energy dissipation device was put forward, and the calculation formulas were given for many parameters, including stiffness, yield displacement, yield load, ultimate displacement and ultimate load. The results show that the new open-hole energy dissipation device has the advantages of superior energy dissipation performance, obvious energy dissipation in two stages, and wide application prospects in structural seismic design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christopher, C. H. and James, D. N. (2004). “Confined Steel Brace for Earthquake Resistant Design.” Engineering Journal (Fourth Quarter), pp. 187: 24–37.
Fan, S. G., Ding, Z. X., Shu, G. P., Shang, C. J. and Liu, M. J. (2016). “Experimental study on a new energy dissipation device of low yield point steel with two-stage energy dissipation and open-pore shape.” Journal of Southeast University, 1(46), pp. 110–117.
Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I. and Heine, A. J. (1972). “Mechanisms of Energy Absorption in Special Devices for Use in Earthquake Resistant Structures.” Bulletin of N.Z. Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), pp. 63–88.
Li, G. and Li, H. N. (2008). “Study on the irregular buildings with “dual functional” metallic damper to multi-dimensional earthquake motions.” Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 30(2), pp. 5–9.
Li, G. and Li, H. N. (2010). “Shaking table experiment of frame structure with “dual functional” metallic damper.” Journal of Vibration and Shock, 29(8), pp. 164–168.
Li, Y. L. and Ou, J. P. (2004a). “The damping force model of X and triangle plate dampers (I)-Based on double linear constitutive relation.” World Earthquake Engineering, 20(1), pp. 10–16.
Li, Y. L. and Ou, J. P. (2004b). “The damping force model of X and triangle plate dampers (II)-Based on the R-O constitutive relation.” World Earthquake Engineering, 20(2), pp. 129–133.
Li, Y. S. and Shen, S. Z. (2004). “Experimental study on seismic behavior of steel frame attached with hysteretic dampers.” Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 36(12), pp. 1623–1626.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods for earthquake resistant building (JGJ 101-1996). Beijing, China Building Industry Press, 1997.
Shang, C. F. A new approach to stainless steel structural design. Thesis (Master). Nanjing: School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2014.
Skinner, R. I., Kelly, J. M. and Heine, A. J. (1974). “Hysteresis Damper for Earthquake-Resistant Structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 3(3), pp. 287–296.
Song, F. M., Wen, D. H. and Li, Z. G. et al. (2008). “The development and application of low yield point steel.” Material & Heat Treatment, 37(6), pp. 85–88.
Tian, J., Yan, Z. C. and Lu, J. L. (2013). “Seismic energy dissipation control research of the multi-ribbed slab structure using low yield point steel.” China Civil Engineering Journal, 46, pp. 32–37.
Tremblay, R. and Stiemer, S. F. (1993). “Energy dissipation through friction bolted connections, Proc. ATC-17-1 on Seismic Isolation.” Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control, 2, pp. 545–556.
Tsai, K. C., Chen, H. W. and Hong, C. P. et al. (1993). “Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction.” Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), pp. 505–528.
Wang, J. J., Shi, Y. J. and Yan, H. et al. (2013). “Experimental study on the seismic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained brace with low yield point.” China Civil Engineering Journal, 46(10), pp. 9–16.
Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Thompson, C. L. and Alonso, J. (1991). “Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices.” Earthquake Spectra, 7(4), pp. 164–168.
Xing, S. T. and Guo, X. (2003). “Study on mechanical behavior and effectiveness of a new type mild steel damper.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 23(6), pp. 179–186.
Xu, Y. H., Li, A. Q. and Huang, Z. (2011). “The experimental study of mild steel damper with parabolic profile.” Journal of building structures, 32(12), pp. 202–209.
Zhang, W. Y., Li, S. Y. and Li, D. W. (2007). “Mild steel damper with diamond open hole and its simulation analysis in the structural damping.” World Earthquake Engineering, 23(1), pp. 151–155.
Zhou, Y. and Liu, J. (1998). “Experimental study on double circular ring mild steel energy dissipater.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(2), pp. 117–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, S., Ding, Z., Du, L. et al. Nonlinear finite element modeling of two-stage energy dissipation device with low-yield-point steel. Int J Steel Struct 16, 1107–1122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-0029-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-0029-4