Skip to main content
Log in

Limited Effect of Twin Boundaries on Radiation Damage

  • Published:
Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) Aims and scope

Abstract

The different influences of the general grain boundary and the twin boundary on the cavity formation were investigated in copper irradiated by helium at room temperature. Large number of the cavities with sizes smaller than 5 nm formed after irradiation, which were almost homogenously distributed inside the grains. However, the distribution of the cavities varied near the general grain boundary and the twin boundary. Cavities-depleted zone was readily observed near the general grain boundaries, which was rarely observed near the twin boundaries. Meanwhile, decoration of dense cavities within the grain boundary plane was observed. The results suggested the limited influence of the twin boundaries as the point defect sinks compared with the general grain boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.J. Zinkle, Fusion Eng. Des. 74, 31 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Liu, Z. Tang, W. Xiao, Z. Wang, Mater. Lett. 109, 221 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Alsabbagh, A. Sarkar, B. Miller, J. Burns, L. Squires, D. Porter, J.I. Cole, K.L. Murty, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 615, 128 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.D. Shen, S. Feng, M. Tang, J.A. Valdez, Y. Wang, K.E. Sickafus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 263115 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Tsuchida, T. Iwai, M. Awano, N. Oshima, R. Suzuki, K. Yasuda, C. Batchuluun, A. Itoh, J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S856 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Chimi, A. Iwase, N. Ishikawa, M. Kobiyama, T. Inami, S. Okuda, J. Nucl. Mater. 297, 355 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Nita, R. Schaeublin, M. Victoria, J. Nucl. Mater. 329–333, 953 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X.M. Bai, A.F. Voter, R.G. Hoagland, M. Nastasi, B.P. Uberuaga, Science 327, 1631 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.A. Thorsen, J.B. Bilde-Sørensen, B.N. Singh, Scr. Mater. 51, 557 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Sakaguchi, M. Endo, S. Watanabe, H. Kinoshita, S. Yamashita, H. Kokawa, J. Nucl. Mater. 434, 65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Tomozawa, Y. Miyahara, K. Kako, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 578, 167 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W.Z. Han, M.J. Demkowicz, E.G. Fu, Y.Q. Wang, A. Misra, Acta Mater. 60, 6341 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S.I. Porollo, A.M. Dvoriashin, Y.V. Konobeev, F.A. Garner, J. Nucl. Mater. 442, S809 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Yun, M.A. Kirk, P.M. Baldo, J. Rest, A.M. Yacout, Z.Z. Insepov, J. Nucl. Mater. 437, 240 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B.V. Cockeram, R.W. Smith, N. Hashimoto, L.L. Snead, J. Nucl. Mater. 418, 121 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Shu, P. Tao, X. Li, Y. Yu, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 303, 84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Stewart, Y. Osetskiy, R. Stoller, J. Nucl. Mater. 417, 1110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Gai, T. Lazauskas, R. Smith, S.D. Kenny, J. Nucl. Mater. 462, 382 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Raineri, S. Coffa, M. Saggio, F. Frisina, E. Rimini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 147, 292 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Guo, X. Zhang, J. Xue, W. Li, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 307, 77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Getto, Z. Jiao, A.M. Monterrosa, K. Sun, G.S. Was, J. Nucl. Mater. 462, 458 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B.S. Li, Y.Y. Du, Z.G. Wang, K.F. Wei, H.P. Zhang, C.F. Yao, H.L. Chang, J.R. Sun, M.H. Cui, Y.B. Sheng, L.L. Pang, Y.B. Zhu, X. Gao, P. Luo, H.P. Zhu, J. Wang, D. Wang, Vacuum 113, 75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Sefta, K.D. Hammond, N. Juslin, B.D. Wirth, Nucl. Fusion 53, 073015 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O. El-Atwani, K. Hattar, J.A. Hinks, G. Greaves, S.S. Harilal, A. Hassanein, J. Nucl. Mater. 458, 216 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S.I. Porollo, A.N. Vorobjev, Y.V. Konobeev, A.M. Dvoriashin, V.M. Krigan, N.I. Budylkin, E.G. Mironova, F.A. Garner, J. Nucl. Mater. 258–263, 1613 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D.J. Edwards, F.A. Garner, S.M. Bruemmer, P. Efsing, J. Nucl. Mater. 384, 249 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11275023) and the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program (No. 2011GB110004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fa-Rong Wan.

Additional information

Available online at http://link.springer.com/journal/40195

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Liu, ZJ. & Wan, FR. Limited Effect of Twin Boundaries on Radiation Damage. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 29, 72–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-015-0363-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-015-0363-0

Keywords

Navigation