Skip to main content
Log in

Application of output feedback sliding mode control to active flutter suppression of two-dimensional airfoil

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of the sliding mode control (SMC) method for active flutter suppression (AFS) and the issues concerning control system discretization and control input constraints were studied using a typical two-dimensional airfoil. The airfoil has a trailing-edge flap for flutter control. The aeroelastic system involves a two-degrees-of-freedom motion (pitch and plunge), and the equations were constructed by utilizing quasi-steady aerodynamic forces. The control system, designed by the output feedback SMC method, was incorporated to suppress the pitch-plunge flutter. Meanwhile, the system discretization and the flap deflection constraints were implemented. Then, a classical Runge-Kutta (RK) algorithm was utilized for numerical calculations. The results indicated that the close-loop system with the SMC system could be stable at a speed above the flutter boundary. However, when the flap deflection limits are reached, the close-loop system with the simple discretized control system loses control. Furthermore, control compensation developed by theoretical analysis was proposed to make the system stable again. The parameter perturbations and the time delay effects were also discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson G O, Kass G J. Active flutter suppression-an emerging technology. J Aircraft, 1972, 9(3): 230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodges G E. Active flutter suppression-B-52 controls configured vehicle. AIAA-73-322, 1973

  3. Roger K L, Hodges G E, Felt L. Active flutter suppression-a flight test demonstration. J Aircraft, 1975, 12(6): 551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waszak M R, Srinathkumar S. Flutter suppression for the active flexible wing: control system design and experimental validation. AIAA-92-2097, 1992

  5. Waszak M R, Srinathkumar S. Flutter suppression for the active flexible wing: a classical design. J Aircraft, 1995, 32(1): 61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang C, Johnson E H, Pi W S. Recent development of the YF-17 active flutter suppression system. J Aircraft, 1981, 11(7): 537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohta H, Fujimori A, Nikiforuk P N, et al. Active flutter suppression for two-dimensional airfoils. J Guid Contr, 1989, 12(2): 188–194

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiong G, Yang C. Synthesis on flutter suppression control law for active aeroelastic wing. AIAA-2001-1463, 2001

  9. Mahesh J K, Stone C R, Garrard W L, et al. Control law synthesis for flutter suppression using linear quadratic gaussian theory. J Guid Contr, 1981, 4(4): 415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghiringhelli G L, Mantegazza P. Active flutter suppression for a wing model. J Aircraft, 1990, 27(4): 334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukhopadhyay V. Flutter suppression digital control law design and testing for the AFW wind-tunnel model. AIAA-92-2095, 1992

  12. Tadi M. State-dependent riccati equation for control of aeroelastic flutter. J Guid, Contr, Dynam, 2003, 26(6): 914–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhoir N, Singh S N. Control of unsteady aeroelastic system via state-dependent riccati equation method. J Guid, Contr, Dynam, 2005, 28(1): 78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nissim E. Reduction of aerodynamic augmented states in active flutter suppression systems. J Aircraft, 1991, 28(1): 82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karpel M. Reduced-order models for integrated aeroservoelastic optimization. J Aircraft, 1999, 36(1): 146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim T, Nagaraja K S, Bhatia K G. Order reduction of state-space aeroelastic models using optimal modal analysis. J Aircraft, 2004, 41(6): 1440–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong G, Yang C. Application of balanced truncation method on aeroservoelastic model reduction (in Chinese). Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2001, 22(2): 168–170

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C M, Hsu C F. Hybrid fuzzy sliding-mode control of an aeroelastic system. J Guid Contr, 2002, 25(4): 829–832

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin C M, Chin W L. Adaptive decoupled fuzzy sliding-mode control of a nonlinear aeroelastic system. J Guid, Contr, Dynam, 2006, 29(1): 206–208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Na S, Librescu L, Marzocca P, et al. Aeroelastic response of flapped wing systems using robust estimation methodology. AIAA-2004-1673, 2004

  21. Na S, Marzocca P, Librescu L, et al. Sliding mode aeroelastic control of supersonic 2-D flapped lifting surfaces. AIAA-2007-2349, 2007

  22. Kim K W, Lee B, Na S, et al. Comparative analysis of control performances applied to a 3-DOFs nonlinear supersonic lifting surface. AIAA-2008-1724, 2008

  23. Wang F. Variable Structure Control with Sliding Modes (in Chinese). Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  24. Utkin V I, Guldner J, Shi J. Sliding Mode Control in Electromechanical Systems. London: Taylor & Francis, 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, C., Song, C., Wu, Z. et al. Application of output feedback sliding mode control to active flutter suppression of two-dimensional airfoil. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 1338–1348 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-0099-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-0099-z

Keywords

Navigation