Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation framework for the public information guidance system

  • Transportation Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The public information guidance system is of considerable significance to the proper operation of regional public facilities. Despite relevant standards and studies, limited evaluation frameworks are currently available that focus on an analytical multidimensional approach to assess the system performance. This paper aims to propose such an evaluation framework to facilitate the design and improvement of the public information guidance system. Sixteen evaluation factors are selected, quantified and normalized, based on which a hierarchical structure is proposed and a composite evaluation index is developed as the representative of the system performance. The public information guidance system in the Suzhou zoo is taken to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti, M. (1996). “Measuring urban sustainability.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 381–424, DOI: 10.1016/ S0195-9255(96)00083-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bie, Y., Gong, X., and Liu, Z. (2015). “Time of day intervals partition for bus schedule using GPS data.” Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 60, pp. 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, H. and Pitfield, D. E. (2010). “ELASTIC–A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 179–188, DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Zhang, W., Chen, J., and Cai, J. (2007). “Evaluating the accessibility about Beijing’s subways in 2008 based on spatial syntax.” Geo-Information Science, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 31–35, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2007.06.006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., Su, B., and Tan, J. (2013). “Developing an evaluation index system for low-carbon tourist attractions in China–A case study examining the Xixi wetland.” Tourism Management, Vol. 36, pp. 314–320, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.10.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X., Tu, H., Yu, H., and Liu, J. (2014). “Design of information signs of multi-modal travel at the decision points in a comprehensive transport hub.” In Proceedings of the 14th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals 2014 (CICTP 2014), pp. 1216–1227, DOI: 10.1061/9780784413623.118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Li, J. M., Zeng, H. J., Cheng, J. Y., and Zhao, J. F. (2012). “Research on computation methods of AHP weight vector and its applications.” Mathematics in Practice and Theory, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 93–100, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2012.07.012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobranskyte-Niskota, A., Perujo, A., and Pregl, M. (2007). Indicators to assess sustainability of transport activities, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dur, F., Yigitcanlar, T., and Bunker, J. M. (2010). “Towards sustainable urban futures: Evaluating urban sustainability performance of the Gold Coast, Australia.” In Proceedings of the 14th IPHS Conference, pp. 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, X. (2006). “An improved LSB algorithm for BMP Files.” Information Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 30–32, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2552.2006. 01.009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foljanty, K. (2015). “Wayfinding design of intermodal passenger stations from the perspective of passengers.” Paper presented at the European Transport Conference 2015, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, M. (2003). “Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment.” Working paper (No. 2003/16), OECD Science, Technology and Industry, DOI: 10.1787/405566708255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, B., Wu, J., and Chen, X. (2009). “Research on space syntax application within the city transportation area.” Urban Planning International, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 79–83, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2009. 01.013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X. C. (2009). “The comprehensive evaluation on the service level of the city public transport.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing 2009 (CINC’09), Vol. 1, pp. 413–416, DOI: 10.1109/CINC.2009.234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghshenas, H. and Vaziri, M. (2012). “Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 115–121, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y. (2013). Traffic demand analysis between clusters of network city based on space syntax, master’s thesis, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajnc, D. and Glavič, P. (2005). “A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 189–208, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. and Huang, C. M. (2007). “Sustainability index for Taipei.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 505–521, DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Liu, X., Hu, D., Wang, R., Yang, W., Li, D., and Zhao, D. (2009). “Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China’s Jining City.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 134–142, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. Y. (2006). Study on systematic evaluation of traffic safety facilities on highways, PhD thesis, Chang’an University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, X. F., Guan, Z. J., and Lu, K. (2012). “Cognition index and standard of Chinese character traffic signs.” Highway, Vol. 10, pp. 114–119, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.04510712.2012.10.025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Wang, S., Chen, W., and Zheng, Y. (2016). “Willingness to board: A novel concept for modeling queuing up passengers.” Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 90, pp. 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., and Tarantola, S. (2005). “Tools for composite indicators building.” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.

  • Reisi, M., Aye, L., Rajabifard, A., and Ngo, T. (2014). “Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 43, pp. 288–296, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ru, H. S. and Peng, D. P. (2013). “The assessment index system for traffic simulation study in China.” Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 253-255, pp. 1650–1661, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ AMM.253-255.1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 9–26, DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 83–98, DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M. (2004). “Evaluating urban sustainability using land-use transport interaction models. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 251–272, DOI: 10.1.1.549.940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, L. G. (1990). “An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 2–8, DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2013). “Efficiency and equity of speed limits in transportation networks.” Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 32, pp. 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. and Li, Y. (2015). “An optimization model for designing a pedestrianoriented signage system in a large passenger hub.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2015 (ICTE 2015), pp. 2588–2596, DOI: 10.1061/9780784479384. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Wu, Y., and Shen, L. (2011). “An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in China.” Habitat International, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 141–149, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zito, P. and Salvo, G. (2011). “Toward an urban transport sustainability index: A European comparison.” European Transport Research Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 179–195, DOI: 10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyuan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, L., Gu, Z., Huang, D. et al. An evaluation framework for the public information guidance system. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1919–1928 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0888-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0888-4

Keywords

Navigation