Altered FGF Signaling Pathways Impair Cell Proliferation and Elevation of Palate Shelves

Weijie Wu; Shuping Gu; Cheng Sun; Wei He; Xiaohua Xie; Xihai Li; Wenduo Ye; Chunlin Qin; Yiping Chen; Jing Xiao; Chao Liu

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136951

Abstract

In palatogenesis, palatal shelves are patterned along the mediolateral axis as well as the anteroposterior axis before the onset of palatal fusion. Fgf10 specifically expressed in lateral mesenchyme of palate maintains Shh transcription in lateral epithelium, while Fgf7 activated in medial mesenchyme by Dlx5, suppressed the expansion of Shh expression to medial epithelium. How FGF signaling pathways regulate the cell behaviors of developing palate remains elusive. In our study, we found that when Fgf8 is ectopically expressed in the embryonic palatal mesenchyme, the elevation of palatal shelves is impaired and the posterior palatal shelves are enlarged, especially in the medial side. The palatal deformity results from the drastic increase of cell proliferation in posterior mesenchyme and decrease of cell proliferation in epithelium. The expression of mesenchymal Fgf10 and epithelial Shh in the lateral palate, as well as the Dlx5 and Fgf7 transcription in the medial mesenchyme are all interrupted, indicating that the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during palatogenesis are disrupted by the ectopic activation of mesenchymal Fgf8. Besides the altered Fgf7, Fgf10, Dlx5 and Shh expression pattern, the reduced Osr2 expression domain in the lateral mesenchyme also suggests an impaired mediolateral patterning of posterior palate. Moreover, the ectopic Fgf8 expression up-regulates pJak1 throughout the palatal mesenchyme and pErk in the medial mesenchyme, but down-regulates pJak2 in the epithelium, suggesting that during normal palatogenesis, the medial mesenchymal cell proliferation is stimulated by FGF/Erk pathway, while the epithelial cell proliferation is maintained through FGF/Jak2 pathway.

Citation: Wu W, Gu S, Sun C, He W, Xie X, Li X, et al. (2015) Altered FGF Signaling Pathways Impair Cell Proliferation and Elevation of Palate Shelves. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951

Editor: Xin Zhang, Columbia University, UNITED STATES

Received: March 21, 2015; Accepted: August 10, 2015; Published: September 2, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All data is available in the paper.

Funding: Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health Grants (R01 DE14044) to Y.C., National Institutes of Health Grants (R01 DE022549) to C.Q., and the National Science Foundation of China Research Grant (No. 81271120) to J.X.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Mammalian palate is constituted by hard and soft palates. The hard palate originates in a small extent from the primary palate and dominantly from secondary palate, while the soft palate is entirely contributed by the secondary palate. Both the palatal primordia, especially the secondary palate are required for the separation of oral cavity to form nasal airway, which is essential for normal feeding and speaking. The studies on mammalian palatogenesis by using mouse models reveal that the secondary palate protrudes out of the maxillary prominences at embryonic day 11.5 (E11.5). In the following E12.5–13.5, the bilateral palatal shelves extend downward beside the developing tongue. At the E14.0, the palatal shelves elevate horizontally and fuse with each other to form an intact palate roof [1]. The growth, elevation and fusion of palatal shelves are accomplished through a series of cell behaviors, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [2, 3, 4]. Any perturbation in these behaviors will lead to cleft palate, making palatogenesis susceptible to the genetic and environmental influence and cleft palate one of the most common congenital birth defects in human population.

The development of secondary palate is accomplished by the reciprocal interactions between the neural crest-derived mesenchyme and the overlying pharyngeal ectoderm. The transcription of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is first detected in the earliest epithelial ruga, which defines the boundary between the hard and soft palates at the E12.0 [5]. During palatogenesis, Shh transcription is restricted to the stripes of rugae [5, 6]. SHH is regarded as a central signal molecule integrating Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) and Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP) signaling during palate development [1, 5, 6, 7]. Epithelial SHH stimulates cell proliferation in the underlying palatal mesenchyme and the expression of Fgf10 through SHH/Smo signaling [7]. The mesenchymal FGF10 in turn maintains the expression of Shh and cell proliferation in palatal epithelium by activating Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2b (FGFR2b) [7, 8, 9]. Also through the SHH/Smo signaling, SHH maintains the expression of Bmp2 in the palatal epithelium, but weakens Bmp4-Msx1feedback loop in the mesenchyme [7].

Although homogeneous in appearance, the palatal shelf displays the heterogeneity of gene expression along the anteroposterior (A-P) and mediolateral (M-L) axes. The expression of Bmp2, Bmp4, Wnt5a and its receptor, Ror2, are robust in the anterior half and decrease gradually along A-P axis [4, 10]. Correspondingly, the transcription factors, Msh homeobox1 (Msx1) and Short Stature homeobox 2 (Shox2) are predominantly expressed in the anterior palate, but absent from the posterior palate [10, 11]. In contrast, the BarH-like homebox 1 (Barx1), Meningioma 1 (Mn1), Mesenchymal homeobox 2 (Meox2), and T-box transcription factor 22 (Tbx22) are only activated in the posterior palatal mesenchyme [1, 5, 12, 13, 14]. Similar to the differential expression pattern along A-P axis, Odd-skipped related-2 (Osr2) and Wnt5a also exhibit a gradient expression pattern along the M-L axis of the palatal shelf [4, 15]. Most intriguingly, Distal-less homeobox 5 (Dlx5) activated in the medial mesenchyme is able to suppress Shh transcription in the medial epithelium of palate by activating Fgf7 expression [16]. Since Fgf10 and Fgf7 are activated in the lateral mesenchyme adjacent to the Shh-expressing rugae and the medial mesenchyme, respectively, it implicates that Shh-Fgf10 and Dlx5-Fgf7 feedback loops may be associated with the establishment of the M-L polarity of palatal shelf [1, 16].

Binding of FGF ligands to FGFRs triggers the phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of FGFRs. The activated FGFRs transduce the signals through four intracellular pathways: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt), Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak/Stat), phosphoinositide phospholipase C (PLCγ) and Erk pathways [17]. The intracellular pathways activated by a certain FGF ligand largely depend on the extra- and intracellular context [17, 18, 19]. Although the roles of FGF7 and FGF10 in palate development have been reported, their exact intracellular mechanism pathways remain elusive. In our study, we conditionally activated Fgf8 in the developing palatal mesenchyme by using Rosa26R-Fgf8 and Osr2-cre^KI alleles [20, 21]. We found that the ectopically expressed Fgf8 disturbed the expression of Fgf7 and Fgf10, which provided us a useful tool to explore the role of FGF signaling in the palate development.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All animals used in this study were bred and treated in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and in compliance with animal protocol approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments at Tulane University (Protocol Number: 0184-R4).

Mouse lines

The Osr2-cre^KI mouse was obtained from Dr. Jiang’s lab at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center [20]. The Rosa26R-Fgf8 line, generated by Dr. Ma at Washington University School of Medicine, has been described previously [21]. We crossed the Osr2-cre^KI mouse with Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse to get the E12.5–18.5 Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 mutants. The K14-cre and Shh-cre lines, previously applied in craniofacial research, were purchased from Jackson Laboratories [22, 23]. For the analysis of Cre activity, the Osr2-cre^KI or Shh-cre mouse was mated with Rosa26R-LacZ mouse to get the embryos from E11.5-E13.5 [24]. The mated mice were checked for vaginal plugs every morning and the noon of plug day was recorded as 0.5 day of pregnancy (E0.5).

X-gal staining and histological analysis

The E11.5-E13.5 Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 embryos were fixed in 0.25% glutaraldehydeat 4°C overnight, passed through 15% and 30% sucrose series, embedded in O.C.T. Compound, and cryo-sectioned at 10 μm. X-gal staining for cryostat sections were performed as described in standard protocol [25]. The E11.5-E18.5 mouse heads were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS, dehydrated through graded ethanol, cleared with xylene, embedded in paraffin, and then, sectioned at 10 μm for standard Hematoxylin/Eosin staining [26]. At least three samples were examined at each stage.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation in the E13.5 embryos was performed by the detection of incorporated BrdU on 10 μm paraffin-embedded sections as described in the previous report [27]. The proliferation index of palatal mesenchyme was defined as the number of BrdU-positive nuclei in a fixed area of the medial or lateral palatal shelves, while the proliferation index of palatal epithelium was calculated as the ratio of the BrdU positive nuclei in 100 counted nuclei. Three samples and at least four sections of each samples were counted and statistically analyzed by student t-test.

In situ hybridization analysis

For section in situ hybridization, samples were harvested in ice-cold PBS and fixed in 4% PFA/PBS at 4°C overnight prior to dehydration through graded ethanol and embedding in paraffin. Samples were sectioned at 10 μm and subjected to non-radioactive in situ hybridization as described previously [11]. The validity of the anti-sense probes for Dlx5, Fgf7, Fgf10, Osr2 and Wnt5a has been reported previously [4, 7, 16]. The whole mount in situ hybridization with anti-sense Shh probe was performed as described previously [28]. Both the section and whole mount in situ hybridization were repeated in the samples collected from three litters.

Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemical staining, samples were fixed in Z-fix (Anatech) at room temperature for 2 hours, dehydrated with gradient alcohol, cleared with xylene, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 10 μm. The rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibodies against pAkt, pErk1/2, pJak1, pJak2 and pPLCγ1 were all produced by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The horseradish peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Vector Laboratories, Inc. Immunohistochemical staining was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instruction using above antibodies. Each antibody was applied on at least three sections from different samples.

Results

Cre activity was specifically distributed in the palatal mesenchyme of Osr2-cre^KI mouse

Previous studies have reported that the expression of Osr2 gene in the developing palate was specifically restricted in the mesenchyme with an increasing gradient from medial to lateral side [15, 29, 30]. The Cre following IRES sequence targeted into the 3’-untranslated region (UTR) of Osr2 locus (Osr2^IresCre) has been applied for the study of mouse palatal development as a valid tool [7, 31]. However, the Cre activity of Osr2^IresCre mouse was detected all-over the palatal mesenchyme from E11.5 without a medial-lateral gradient [29, 32]. Moreover, a subset of Osr2^IresCre mouse embryos exhibited an ectopic Cre activity, which might affect the accuracy of the interpretation of phenotypes [29]. To circumvent the influence of the ectopic Cre activity, we adopted the Osr2-cre^KI line replacing the Osr2 coding sequence with Cre cDNA in our following study [20]. When we crossed the Osr2-cre^KI line with the Rosa26R-LacZ reporter line, Cre-mediated activation of LacZ expression showed that at E11.5, the Cre activity only could be detected in the mesenchyme connecting the mandible and maxillary processes, but excluded from anterior and posterior palate shelves (Fig 1A and 1B). In the E12.5 palatal shelves, Cre activity was distributed throughout the anterior and posterior mesenchyme without a medial to lateral gradient (Fig 1C and 1D). In the E13.5 palatal shelves, although the LacZ pattern showed an all-over distribution of Cre activity in the anterior palatal mesenchyme, but in the posterior palate, Cre activity was only detected in the medial and lateral mesenchyme with the same intensity, and absent from the central mesenchyme (Fig 1E and 1F).

Download:

Fig 1. Cre pattern in the developing palatal shelves detected by lacZ expression in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-LacZ embryos. (A-F)

Cre-mediated LacZ expression in the developing Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-LacZ palatal shelves. At E11.5, both the nascent anterior (A) and posterior palatal shelves (B) were devoid of LacZ staining. A slight LacZ staining was only detected in the connecting area between mandible and maxillary process (Arrows in A). At E12.5, Cre-mediated LacZ expression was activated throughout the anterior (C) and posterior palatal mesenchyme (D), but specifically absent from the palatal epithelium (arrows in C&D). At E13.5, Cre activity evenly distributed anterior palate mesenchyme (E). However, Cre activity was only found in the medial and lateral mesenchyme of the posterior palate (arrowheads in F), but absent from the central part (_* in F). Judged by the LacZ intensity, there was no difference in Cre activity between the medial and lateral palatal mesenchyme (C-F). (Scale bar: 200um)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g001

Over-expression of Fgf8 by Osr2-Cre^KI results in complete cleft palate

To investigate the influence of over-dosage FGF8 on the palate development, we crossed the Osr2-Cre^KI line with the Rosa26R-Fgf8 line [21]. The Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 embryos displayed normal palatal outgrowth up to E12.5 (data not shown). At E13.5, the anterior palatal shelves of Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 embryos were comparable to the wild type littermates (Fig 2A and 2B), but the posterior palatal shelves were enlarged, especially in the medial side (Fig 2C and 2D). At E14.5, the anterior palatal shelves had elevated to horizontal position in the wild type embryos, while still being kept in the vertical position in the mutant littermates (Fig 2E and 2F). The E14.5 wild type posterior palatal shelves had contacted with each other and formed midline epithelial seam after elevation (Fig 2G). Whereas, the posterior shelves of the E14.5 Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 embryo failed to elevate (Fig 2H). The secondary palate of wild type embryos completely fused and separated oral from nasal cavity in both the anterior and posterior halves at E18.5 (Fig 2I and 2K), but the enlarged mutant palatal shelves only elevated slightly in the anterior, and stayed vertical in the posterior half (Fig 2J and 2L), resulting in a complete cleft palate which was lethal to the newborn mice.

Download:

Fig 2. The complete cleft palate in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse embryos.

(A-L) Cross sections by HE staining of the developing Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves. At E13.5, the anterior palatal shelves showed no difference between the WT (A) and Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 (B) embryos. By contrast, the mutant posterior palatal shelves (D) were significantly enlarged in size, compared with the WT posterior palatal shelves (C), especially in the medial side (bidirectional arrow in D). When the WT palatal shelves elevated horizontally at the anterior (E) and even initiated fusion by forming middle epithelial seam in the posterior (arrow in G) at E14.5, the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves still kept their vertical status in both anterior (F) and the posterior (H) with the obvious enlarged medial side (bidirectional arrow in H). At E18.5, the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 embryos exhibited the complete cleft palate: the anterior palatal shelves only elevated slightly (J) and the enlarged posterior shelves showed no sign of elevation (L, bidirectional arrow delineated the enlarged medial mesenchyme). By contrast, the E18.5 WT palate shelves had fused with each other and separated oral from nasal cavity in the anterior (I) and posterior (K) (Scale bar: 200um)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g002

Abnormal cell proliferation in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves

To explore how the constitutively activated Fgf8 enlarged the posterior palatal shelves, we compared the cell proliferation by BrdU labelling test between wild type and Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 posterior palatal shelves. Compared with their wild type littermates, the amount of BrdU labelled cells of E13.5 Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 posterior palatal shelves increased significantly in both medial and lateral mesenchyme (Fig 3A, 3B and 3E), but decreased drastically in the epithelium (from 19.364 to 13.222; Fig 3C, 3D and 3F). The number of BrdU positive cells of the medial mesenchyme (64.667) was higher than that of the lateral mesenchyme (61.556) in the E13.5 Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves (Fig 3E). In contrast, the proliferating medial mesenchymal cells (48.455) were less than those of lateral side (50.455) in the wild type palatal shelves (Fig 3E). However, these differences had no statistical significance (Fig 3E). The BrdU-labelling examination indicated that the enlarged palatal shelves of Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mice resulted from the increased mesenchymal cell proliferation stimulated by the mesenchyme derived FGF8. It also implied that the palatal mesenchyme derived FGF8 had an inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation of palatal epithelium.

Download:

Fig 3. The examination on cell proliferation ratio of the developing palatal shelves of Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse embryos.

(A-D) Cell proliferation test by BrdU labelling for the E13.5 Osr2-Cre^KI; Ros26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves. The BrdU labelled cells in the E13.5 WT medial (red circle in A) and lateral palatal mesenchyme (blue circle in A) were less than those in the Osr2-Cre^KI; Ros26R-Fgf8 medial (violet circle in B) and lateral mesenchyme (green circle in B). Opposing to the mesenchymal cell proliferation ratio, the number of BrdU positive cells in the E13.5 WT palatal epithelium (arrows in C) was more than that in the mutant palatal epithelium (arrows in D). (E, F) Statistics of the numbers of BrdU labelled cells in the E13.5 palatal shelves. The number of proliferating medial mesenchymal cells significantly raised from 48.455 (SD = 8.722, SE = 2.629) in WT to 64.667 (SD = 5.937, SE = 1.979) in the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse (P<0.01). Similarly, the proliferating cells in lateral mesenchyme raised greatly from 50.455 (SD = 6.758, SE = 1.983) in WT to 61.556 (SD = 4.362, SE = 1.454) in the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse (P<0.01) (E). The difference in cell proliferation ratio between the medial and lateral palatal mesenchyme had no significance in both WT and Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse (E). Reversely, the amount of proliferating cells in palatal epithelium dropped drastically from 19.364 (SD = 2.942, SE = 0.887) in WT to 13.322 (SD = 3.114, SE = 1.038) in the Osr2-Cre^KI; Ros26R-Fgf8 mouse (P<0.01) (F). (C and D were the enlarged areas of the square boxes in A and B, respectively; Dashed lines in C and D delineated the boundary between mesenchyme and epithelium; SD, Standard Derivation; SE, Standard Error; Scale bar: 200um)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g003

FGF8 had no direct effects on the Shh expression and cell proliferation in palatal epithelium

SHH directly stimulates the mesenchymal cell proliferation of the developing palatal shelves and indirectly promotes epithelial cell proliferation by activating mesenchymal Fgf10 [5, 7]. Whole mount in situ hybridization with Shh probe was performed to examine if FGF8 up-regulated the Shh transcription to stimulate mesenchymal cell proliferation. Surprisingly, when Shh was activated in the most anterior 3 rugae of the WT palatal shelves at E13.5, only a slight expression of Shh was detected in the most anterior ruga of the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves (Fig 4A and 4B). At E14.5, when Shh expression was detected in all 8 rugae of the fused wild type palate, there were only two short Shh-expressing rugae found in the mutant littermates (Fig 4C and 4D). These phenomena suggested that the epithelial Shh transcription was inhibited by ectopic FGF8. To examine if FGF8 exerted a direct inhibition on Shh transcription, the Rosa26R-Fgf8 allele was constitutively activated by K14-Cre and Shh-Cre. Intriguingly, cleft palate was only detected in the Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8embryos with an unaffected Shh expression in palatal shelves (Fig 4E, 4F and 4G), and not detected in the K14-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 mice at all (data not shown). Furthermore, although the cell proliferation exhibited a marked decrease in both the E13.5 medial and lateral Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme compared with their wild type controls (Fig 4H and 4J), there was no significant difference in the palatal epithelia between the E13.5 WT and Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 littermates (Fig 4H, 4I and 4K). Therefore, FGF8 does not directly suppress Shh expression and cell proliferation in palatal epithelium. Taken together, the disrupted Shh expression in the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal epithelium was supposed to be attributed to altered gene expression in palatal mesenchyme, instead of the direct inhibition by FGF8.

Download:

Fig 4. FGF8 does not directly inhibit Shh expression and palatal epithelial cell proliferation.

(A-D) Whole mount in situ hybridization for Shh expression in Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate. At E13.5, a robust Shh transcription was detected in the most anterior rugae of the WT palate (arrows in A); only a trace of Shh transcription was found in the most anterior ruga in mutant littermate (arrow in B). At E14.5, there were 8 Shh-expressing rugae in WT palate (arrows in C), while in Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate, only two short Shh-expressing rugae were emerging (arrows in D). (E, F) Whole mount in situ hybridization with Shh probe in Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate. Although a complete cleft palate was detected in Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 mouse at E14.5 (F), both the WT (E) and their mutant littermates (F) show 8 Shh-expressing rugae. (G) X-gal staining demonstrates that at E13.5, Cre activity was distributed all over the palatal epithelium of the Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-LacZ mouse. (H-K) BrdU labelled test and statistical analysis for E13.5 palatal cell proliferation. The E13.5 cell proliferation of WT (H) and Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 (I) palatal shelves showed significant difference in mesenchyme (J) and no difference in epithelium (K). The BrdU labelled cells of Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 lateral mesenchyme (42.625, SD = 6.805, SE = 2.404; violet column in J) were significantly less than that of WT control (53.25, SD = 3.615, SE = 1.278; red column in J) (P<0.01); similarly, the BrdU positive cells in medial Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 mesenchyme (49, SD = 4.44, SE = 1.569; green column in J) were dramatically less than WT littermate (55.625, SD = 3.335, SE = 1.179; blue column in J) (P<0.01). Although the cell proliferation of both the medial and lateral Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 mesenchyme decreased, the drop in the lateral side was more significant than the medial side (P<0.05). The BrdU labelled epithelial cells in Shh-Cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate (22.5, SD = 2.976, SE = 1.052; red column in K) were slightly more than WT control (21, SD = 3.023,SE = 1.069; blue column in K), but the increase has no significance (P>0.05) (Red and blue circles in H and violet and green circles in I delineate medial and lateral mesenchyme, respectively; Dashed lines in B, D and F delineate the edge of palatal shelves; Dashed lines in H and I stand for the layer of epithelium; SD, Standard Deviation;SE, Standard Error; Scale bar: 200um)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g004

The altered gene expression in the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme

Then, we examined the transcription of a series of mesenchymal markers by in situ hybridization. Consistent with the loss of Shh expression in epithelial rugae, the expression of Fgf10 diminished from the lateral mesenchyme in the E13.5 Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves (Fig 5A and 5B), indicating that the increased mesenchymal cell proliferation was attributed to FGF8, instead of FGF10 as in normal palatal development. Identical to medial Fgf10 expression, the expression of Fgf7 disappeared in the E13.5 mutant medial palatal shelves (Fig 5C and 5D). As the upstream activator of Fgf7, the transcription of Dlx5 was suppressed in the E13.5 Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 medial palatal mesenchyme (Fig 5E and 5F). Another transcription factor, Osr2 which was reported to be dominantly expressed in the lateral mesenchyme [15, 33], displayed a reduced expression domain along the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 lateral palatal mesenchyme (Fig 5G and 5H). However, Wnt5a, a growth factor which was also expressed with a priority in lateral palate [4, 34], showed no difference between wild type and mutant palatal shelves (Fig 5I and 5L). These results indicated that the ectopically activated Fgf8 expression disrupted the Shh-Fgf10 feedback loop required for cell proliferation in normal palate development, and stimulated the proliferation of medial and lateral palatal mesenchymal cells indiscriminately.

Download:

Fig 5. The expression pattern ofmesenchyme markers inthe Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate.

(A-J) In situ hybridization for mesenchymal markers of E13.5 palatal shelves. Fgf10 was activated in the lateral mesenchyme of WT palate (arrow in A), but silenced in Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate (B). Similarly, Fgf7 activated in WT medial palatal mesenchyme (arrow in C) disappeared in mutant palate (D). The expression of Dlx5 acting as the activator of Fgf7 was detected in medial side of WT palatal mesenchyme (arrow in E), but not in the palate of mutant littermate (F). Compared with the Osr2 expression in WT lateral palate (arrow in G), the domain of Osr2 in the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate reduced from the distal mesenchyme (arrow in H). The expression of Wnt5a detected in lateral mesenchyme of the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate (arrow in J) was comparable to that in the WT (arrow in I).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g005

The altered FGF signaling pathways inthe Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves

To reveal how the ectopic FGF8 exerted the function on the developing palatal mesenchyme, antibodies against pivotal transducers of FGF signaling pathways were applied in immunohistochemistry. There are four intracellular pathways mediating the biological function of FGF ligands, including PI3K/Akt pathway, Erk pathway, Jak/Stat pathway and PLCγ pathway [17]. There was no difference detected in the four signaling pathways between the E13.5 wild type and Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 anterior palatal shelves (data not shown). However, an elevation of Phosphorylated Erk (pErk) was detected in the medial side of Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 posterior palatal shelves, but not in the wild type posterior palatal shelves (Fig 6A, 6A’, 6B and 6B’). For the Jak-Stat pathway, the level of phosphorylated Jak1 (pJak1) was drastically up-regulated in the mutant palatal mesenchyme compared with the wild type control (Fig 6C, 6C’, 6D and 6D’), while the phosphorylated Jak2 (pJak2), which is restricted in the wild type lateral palatal mesenchyme, diminished from the mutant palatal mesenchyme, but was drastically up-regulated in the mutant epithelium (Fig 6E, 6E’, 6F and 6F’). In contrast, the level of the phosphorylated PLCγ1 (pPLCγ1) and the phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) exhibited no discrepancy in the palatal mesenchyme between the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 mice and their wild type littermates (Fig 6G–6J). These alterations on FGF signaling pathways suggested that the ectopically activated FGF8 stimulated mesenchymal cell proliferation indiscriminately in all of the mesenchyme through pJak1/Stat pathway and specifically in medial mesenchyme through pErk pathway. Moreover, the cell proliferation of palatal epithelium could be disabled by pJak2-Stat pathway.

Download:

Fig 6. The pattern ofphosphorylated FGF signaling mediators in the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate.

(A-H) Immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated FGF signaling mediators in E13.5 palatal shelves. pErk was specifically activated in the medial mesenchyme of Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate (arrow in B), but absent from WT palate mesenchyme (A). WT palatal mesenchyme was devoid of pJak1 (C), while the mutant palatal mesenchyme showed a strong level of pJak1 (D). Normally, the pJak2 was limited to the WT lateral mesenchyme (arrow in E) and absent from palatal epithelium (E); by contrast, the pJak2 was diminished in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme and activated in the epithelium (F). The level of pAkt in the mesenchyme and epithelium of WT palate (G) is comparable to that in mutant palate (H). Similarly, compared with the WT control (I), the level of pPLCγ1 showed no difference in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme and epithelium (J). (A’-F’) The enlarged views of the boxed areas in A-F. Black arrow in B’ meant the enhanced pErk area; black arrow in E’ pointed to the active pJak2 region, and red arrows in E’ and F’ to palatal epithelium; the dashed line in E and E’ delineated the boundary between medial and lateral mesenchyme. (Scale bar: 200um)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136951.g006

Discussion

Ectopic activation of Fgf8 results in increased cell proliferation and failure of elevation of palatal shelves

Cleft palate is one of the most common congenital defects in human newborns. The high morbidity is attributed to the susceptibility of the finely regulated events to various influences during palatogenesis. The mouse models mimicking human cleft palate revealed that cell proliferation is the most subtle event to be affected. Most cases of cleft palate resulted from a reduced cell proliferation, which retarded outgrowth from maxillary process and horizontal growth toward mid-line of palatal shelves [7, 10, 11, 30, 35, 36]. The hypothesis that cell proliferation is involved in the re-orientation and elevation of palatal shelves has been reviewed in detail [1]. In our study, the mesenchymal cell proliferation drastically increased in both the medial and lateral sides by the over-expressed Fgf8 in mesenchyme, which in turn, altered the palate size and morphology, but cleft palate still happened due to the failure of elevation of the palatal shelves, indicating that the sole horizontal expansion of palatal shelves is insufficient to complete the palatal elevation. During normal palatogenesis, palate elevation is initiated from the anterior part in a “flip-up” manner and extends to posterior palate [1]. In the Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate, although the elevation has been initiated in the anterior, it failed in the posterior half. Therefore, the ectopic FGF8 not only enhances mesenchymal cell proliferation, but also impairs the reorientation of the posterior palatal shelves.

During palatogenesis, Fgf7 and Fgf10 are confined to the medial and lateral mesenchyme, respectively. Fgf7 knockout mouse survives to adulthood without cleft palate [37]. Even in the Dlx5 null mice, in which Fgf7 expression is greatly decreased, the palatal shelves are able to elevate to horizontal position [16]. By contrast, the palatal shelves of Fgf10 deficient mouse stay vertical at E15 with a reduced size [8]. Therefore, although the ectopic activation of Fgf8 suppressed the expression of Dlx5 and Fgf7, the ablation of Fgf10 expression in the developing palate is regarded as the cause of the failure of palatal elevation.

Reverse effects of ectopic FGF8 on the cell proliferation of palatal epithelium and mesenchyme

In normal palate development, FGFR2b is distributed in the epithelium and FGFR2c in mesenchyme [8]. FGF10 signals epithelial cells by binding the FGFR2b to maintain the epithelial cell proliferation [7]. Previous studies showed that FGFR2c had a much higher affinity to FGF8 binding than FGFR2b, while FGF10 had the highest affinity to FGFR2b [38]. Therefore, we assume that the ectopic activated Fgf8 directly enhanced both the lateral and medial mesenchymal proliferation through FGFR2c. Previous genetic screening demonstrates that the mutations of Fgfr1 and Fgfr3 are also associated with human cleft palate [39, 40]. Recently, ablation of Fgfr1 from neural crest cells was reported to compromise the cell proliferation, elevation and fusion of palate [41]. These results suggest that FGF8 can stimulate the cell proliferation through FGFRs, especially FGFR1, more than FGFR2c. On the other hand, the reduced cell proliferation in palatal epithelium is attributed to the diminished Fgf10 expression in Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate, instead of the direct inhibition by FGF8, because ectopically activated Fgf8 in palatal epithelium has no effect on epithelial proliferation and Shh transcription. Based on the unaffected epithelial cell proliferation, the normal Shh expression and the elevation of palate, it is suggested that the FGF8 did not disrupt the Fgf10-Shh interaction loop in Shh-cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate. Interestingly, cell proliferation was decreased in both the medial and lateral mesenchyme of Shh-cre;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate. The controversial effect on cell proliferation by FGF8 may result from the earlier activation of Osr2-cre than Shh-cre [20, 23], and /or the different dosage of FGF8 produced by mesenchyme and epithelium, considering the larger amount of mesenchymal cells than that of epithelial cells.

Differential FGF signaling pathways are involved in the cell proliferation and Fgf10 expression in palatal shelves

In the Fgfr2^C342Y/C342Y mutants, the transcription of intracellular FGF signaling pathway suppressors, Sprouty2 and Sprouty4 is up-regulated [39, 40]. Deficiency of Sprouty2 increases mesenchymal cell proliferation and the level of pErk in the developing palate [42]. Therefore, we speculate that the imbalanced cell proliferation, delayed elevation and reduced size of palatal shelves in the Fgfr2^C342Y/C342Y mutants result from the up-regulated Erk signaling pathway. Our study found that the up-regulated pErk was concentrated in the Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 medial mesenchyme, instead of the entire palatal mesenchyme. Combined with the ablation of Dlx5 and Fgf7 in the same region, we assume that FGF/pErk signaling pathway promotes the cell proliferation, but is unable to maintain Fgf10 expression in the medial mesenchyme. Meanwhile, the down-regulated pJak2 in the Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 lateral mesenchyme might also be involved in the loss of Fgf10 transcription. Similarly, the elevated pJak1 level throughout the palatal mesenchyme may be regarded as the activator for mesenchymal cell proliferation.

The altered gene expression along the mediolateral axis of the developing palate shelves

In the E13.5 Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate, the enlarged medial and lateral mesenchyme are accompanied with the diminished Dlx5 and Fgf7 expression, and the disappeared Fgf10 expression, respectively. The Osr2-expressing domain was also reduced along lateral mesenchyme. Although these alterations suggest the attenuation of lateral identity of Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate, it is hard to conclude if the mediolateral patterning of the Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves has been impaired because of the lack of a functional marker identifying the medial or lateral mesenchyme of palate. For this reason, whether the fate of the medial and lateral mesenchyme is changed by the ectopic FGF8, still requires further investigation. Although Wnt5a plays an essential role in the cell migration along the anterior-posterior axis [4], its unaffected pattern in Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate suggests that Wnt5a is not involved in mediolateral identity.

Walker and Fraser hypothesized that horizontal outgrowth of the medial mesenchyme remodeled the vertical posterior palatal shelves into elevating shelves [1]. The horizontal outgrowth is at least partially mimicked by increased medial cell proliferation in the Osr2-cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palate. As demonstrated in our study, the excessive proliferation in medial mesenchyme by over-expressed Fgf8 failed to compensate for the failure of elevation. Considering the alteration on the gene expression along the mediolateral axis of palatal shelves, the mediolateral patterning may be impaired. The cleft palate caused by loss of mediolateral patterning most likely results from disrupted cell migration. This proposal is supported by the decreased glycosaminoglycan accumulation and synthesis in the gain-of-function of Fgfr2 mutation [39]. Although the existence of cell migration along the mediolateral axis during palate elevation is still in debate, the cell migration along the mediolateral axis is the one of the most preferred events for further investigation. Furthermore, there is no impact on FGF signaling pathway in the Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 anterior palate, implying that the responsiveness to FGF signaling also varies along the A-P axis of palatal shelves. Further study on the intracellular FGF signaling pathway that regulates gene expression and cell behavior will provide us a thorough understanding of its role in the palatogenesis.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants (R01 DE14044) to Y.C., National Institutes of Health Grants (R01 DE022549) to C. Q and the National Science Foundation of China Research Grant (No. 81271120) to J.X. We also express our gratitude to Dr. Priyam H. Jani and Dr. Logan Shaun for the manuscript proofreading.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YC CQ JX CL. Performed the experiments: WW CS WH XX XL. Analyzed the data: SG WY CL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YC CQ. Wrote the paper: CL.

References

1. Bush JO, Jiang RL. (2012) Palatogenesis: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development. 139: 231–243. pmid:22186724
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Dudas M, Li WY, Kim J, Yang A, Kaartinen V. (2007) Palatal fusion—where do the midline cells go? A review on cleft palate, a major human birth defect. Acta Histochem. 109:1–14. pmid:16962647
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Gritli-Linde A. (2007) Molecular control of secondary palate development. Dev Biol. 301:309–326. pmid:16942766
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. He FL, Xiong W, Yu X, Espinoza-Lewis R, Liu C, Gu S, et al. (2008) Wnt5a regulates directional cell migration and cell proliferation via Ror2-mediated non-canonical pathway in mammalian palate development. Development. 135: 3871–3879. pmid:18948417
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Welsh IC, O'Brien TP. (2009) Signaling integration in the rugae growth zone directs sequential SHH signaling center formation during the rostral outgrowth of the palate. Dev Biol. 336: 53–67 pmid:19782673
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Economou AD, Ohazama A, Porntaveetus T, Sharpe PT, Kondo S, Basson MA, et al. (2012) Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate. Nat Genet. 44: 348–351. pmid:22344222
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Lan Y, Jiang RL. (2009) Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions controlling palatal outgrowth. Development. 136: 1387–1396. pmid:19304890
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Rice R, Spencer-Dene B, Connor EC, Gritli-Linde A, McMahon AP, Dickson C, et al. (2004) Disruption of Fgf10/Fgfr2b-coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions causes cleft palate. J Clin Invest. 113: 1692–1700. pmid:15199404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Hosokawa R, Deng X, Takamori K, Xu X, Urata M, Bringas P Jr, et al. (2009) Epithelial-specific requirement of FGFR2 signaling during tooth and palate development. J ExpZool B Mol Dev Evol. 312B: 343–350.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Zhang Z, Song Y, Zhao X, Zhang X, Fermin C, Chen YP. (2002) Rescue of cleft palate in Msx1-deficient mice by transgenic Bmp4 reveals a network of BMP and Shh signaling in the regulation of mammalian palatogenesis. Development. 129: 4135–46. pmid:12163415
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Yu L, Gu S, Alappat S, Song Y, Yan M, Zhang X, et al. (2005) Shox2-deficient mice exhibit a rare type of incomplete clefting of the secondary palate. Development. 132: 4397–4406. pmid:16141225
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Hilliard SA, Yu L, Gu S, Zhang Z, Chen YP. (2005) Regional regulation of palatal growth and patterning along the anterior-posterior axis in mice. J Anat. 207:655–667. pmid:16313398
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Li Q, Ding J. (2007) Gene expression analysis reveals that formation of the mouse anterior secondary palate involves recruitment of cells from the posterior side. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 51: 167–172. pmid:17294368
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Pantalacci S, Prochazka J, Martin A, Rothova M, Lambert A, Bernard L, et al. (2008) Patterning of palatal rugae through sequential addition reveals an anterior/posterior boundary in palatal development. BMC Dev. Biol. 8:116. pmid:19087265
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Wang Q, Jiang RL. (2004) Odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) encodes a key intrinsic regulator of secondary palate growth and morphogenesis. Development. 131: 3207–3216. pmid:15175245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Han J, Mayo J, Xu X, Li J, Bringas P Jr, Maas RL, et al. (2009) Indirect modulation of Shh signaling by Dlx5 affects the oral-nasal patterning of palate and rescues cleft palate in Msx1-null mice. Development. 136: 4225–33. pmid:19934017
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Lanner F, Rossant J. (2010) The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development. 137:3351–3360. pmid:20876656
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Bellmunt J, Teh BT, Tortora G, Rosenberg JE. (2013) Molecular targets on the horizon for kidney and urothelial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 10: 557–570. pmid:23982523
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Goetz R, Mohammadi M. (2013) Exploring mechanisms of FGF signalling through the lens of structural biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 14:166–180. pmid:23403721
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Chen J, Lan Y, Baek JA, Gao Y, Jiang RL. (2009) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling plays an essential role in activation of odontogenic mesenchyme during early tooth development. Dev Biol. 334:174–185. pmid:19631205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Lin C, Yin Y, Bell SM, Veith GM, Chen H, Huh SH, et al. (2013) Delineating a conserved genetic cassette promoting outgrowth of body appendages. PLoS Genet 9: e1003231 pmid:23358455
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. He F, Xiong W, Wang Y, Li L, Liu C, Yamagami T, et al.(2011) Epithelial Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates palatal shelf fusion through regulation of Tgfβ3 expression. Dev Biol. 350:511–519. pmid:21185284
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Ahn Y, Sanderson BW, Klein OD, Krumlauf R. (2010) Inhibition of Wnt signaling by Wise (Sostdc1) and negative feedback from Shh controls tooth number and patterning.Development. 137:3221–3231. pmid:20724449
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Soriano P. (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet. 21:70–71. pmid:9916792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y, Bringas P Jr, Han J, Rowitch DH, et al. (2000) Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127: 1671–1679. pmid:10725243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Presnell JK, Schreibman MP. (1997). Humason’s Animal Tissue Techniques. JohnHopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
27. Gu S, Wei N, Yu L, Fei J, Chen YP. (2008) Shox2-deficiency leads to dysplasia and ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint in mice. Mech Dev. 125:729–742. pmid:18514492
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Gu S, Wei N, Yu X, Jiang Y, Fei J, Chen YP. (2008) Mice with an anterior cleft of the palate survive neonatal lethality. Dev Dyn. 237:1509–1516. pmid:18393307
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Lan Y, Wang Q, Ovitt CE, Jiang RL. (2007) A unique mouse strain expressing Crerecombinase for tissue-specific analysis of gene function in palate and kidney development. Genesis. 45:618–624. pmid:17941042
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Zhou J, Gao Y, Lan Y, Jia S, Jiang RL (2013) Pax9 regulates a molecular network involving Bmp4, Fgf10, Shh signaling and the Osr2 transcription factor to control palate morphogenesis. Development. 140: 4709–4718. pmid:24173808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Xiong W, He F, Morikawa Y, Yu X, Zhang Z, Lan Y, et al. (2009) Hand2 is required in the epithelium for palatogenesis in mice. Dev Biol. 330:131–141. pmid:19341725
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Li J, Huang X, Xu X, Mayo J, Bringas P Jr, Jiang R, et al. (2011) SMAD4-mediated WNT signaling controls the fate of cranial neural crest cells during tooth morphogenesis. Development 138:1977–1989. pmid:21490069
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Gao Y, Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Jiang R. (2009) Functional equivalence of the zinc finger transcription factors Osr1 and Osr2 in mouse development. Dev Biol. 328:200–209. pmid:19389375
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Almaidhan A, Cesario J, Landin MA, Zhao Y, Sharma N, Choi V, et al. (2014) Neural crest- specific deletion of Ldb1 leads to cleft secondary palate with impaired palatal shelf elevation. BMC Dev Biol. 14:3. pmid:24433583
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Liu W, Lan Y, Pauws E, Meester-Smoor MA, Stanier P, Zwarthoff EC, et al. (2008) The Mn1 transcription factor acts upstream of Tbx22 and preferentially regulates posterior palate growth in mice. Development. 135: 3959–3968. pmid:18948418
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Enomoto H, Nelson CM, Somerville RP, Mielke K, Dixon LJ, Powell K, et al. (2010) Cooperation of two ADAMTS metalloproteases in closure of the mouse palate identifies a requirement for versican proteolysis in regulating palatal mesenchyme proliferation. Development. 137: 4029–4038. pmid:21041365
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Guo L, Degenstein L, Fuchs E. (1996) Keratinocyte growth factor is required for hair development but not for wound healing. Genes Dev. 10:165–175. pmid:8566750
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Zhang X, Ibrahimi OA, Olsen SK, Umemori H, Mohammadi M, Ornitz DM. (2006) Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family. J Biol Chem. 281:15694–15700. pmid:16597617
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Snyder-Warwick AK, Perlyn CA, Pan J, Yu K, Zhang L, Ornitz DM. (2010) Analysis of a gain-of-function FGFR2 Crouzon mutation provides evidence of loss of function activity in the etiology of cleft palate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.107: 2515–2520. pmid:20133659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Riley BM, Mansilla MA, Ma J, Daack-Hirsch S, Maher BS, Raffensperger LM, et al. (2007) Impaired FGF signaling contributes to cleft lip and palate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104: 4512–4517. pmid:17360555
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Wang C, Chang JY, Yang C, Huang Y, Liu J, You P, et al. (2013) Type 1 fibroblast growth factor receptor in cranial neural crest cell-derived mesenchyme is required for palatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 288:22174–22183. pmid:23754280
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Matsumura K, Taketomi T, Yoshizaki K, Arai S, Sanui T, Yoshiga D, et al. (2011) Sprouty2 controls proliferation of palate mesenchymal cells via fibroblast growth factor signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 404:1076–1082. pmid:21195053
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Bush JO, Jiang RL. (2012) Palatogenesis: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development. 139: 231–243. pmid:22186724
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Dudas M, Li WY, Kim J, Yang A, Kaartinen V. (2007) Palatal fusion—where do the midline cells go? A review on cleft palate, a major human birth defect. Acta Histochem. 109:1–14. pmid:16962647
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Gritli-Linde A. (2007) Molecular control of secondary palate development. Dev Biol. 301:309–326. pmid:16942766
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. He FL, Xiong W, Yu X, Espinoza-Lewis R, Liu C, Gu S, et al. (2008) Wnt5a regulates directional cell migration and cell proliferation via Ror2-mediated non-canonical pathway in mammalian palate development. Development. 135: 3871–3879. pmid:18948417
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Welsh IC, O'Brien TP. (2009) Signaling integration in the rugae growth zone directs sequential SHH signaling center formation during the rostral outgrowth of the palate. Dev Biol. 336: 53–67 pmid:19782673
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Economou AD, Ohazama A, Porntaveetus T, Sharpe PT, Kondo S, Basson MA, et al. (2012) Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate. Nat Genet. 44: 348–351. pmid:22344222
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Lan Y, Jiang RL. (2009) Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions controlling palatal outgrowth. Development. 136: 1387–1396. pmid:19304890
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Rice R, Spencer-Dene B, Connor EC, Gritli-Linde A, McMahon AP, Dickson C, et al. (2004) Disruption of Fgf10/Fgfr2b-coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions causes cleft palate. J Clin Invest. 113: 1692–1700. pmid:15199404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Hosokawa R, Deng X, Takamori K, Xu X, Urata M, Bringas P Jr, et al. (2009) Epithelial-specific requirement of FGFR2 signaling during tooth and palate development. J ExpZool B Mol Dev Evol. 312B: 343–350.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Zhang Z, Song Y, Zhao X, Zhang X, Fermin C, Chen YP. (2002) Rescue of cleft palate in Msx1-deficient mice by transgenic Bmp4 reveals a network of BMP and Shh signaling in the regulation of mammalian palatogenesis. Development. 129: 4135–46. pmid:12163415
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Yu L, Gu S, Alappat S, Song Y, Yan M, Zhang X, et al. (2005) Shox2-deficient mice exhibit a rare type of incomplete clefting of the secondary palate. Development. 132: 4397–4406. pmid:16141225
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hilliard SA, Yu L, Gu S, Zhang Z, Chen YP. (2005) Regional regulation of palatal growth and patterning along the anterior-posterior axis in mice. J Anat. 207:655–667. pmid:16313398
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Li Q, Ding J. (2007) Gene expression analysis reveals that formation of the mouse anterior secondary palate involves recruitment of cells from the posterior side. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 51: 167–172. pmid:17294368
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Pantalacci S, Prochazka J, Martin A, Rothova M, Lambert A, Bernard L, et al. (2008) Patterning of palatal rugae through sequential addition reveals an anterior/posterior boundary in palatal development. BMC Dev. Biol. 8:116. pmid:19087265
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Wang Q, Jiang RL. (2004) Odd-skipped related 2 (Osr2) encodes a key intrinsic regulator of secondary palate growth and morphogenesis. Development. 131: 3207–3216. pmid:15175245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Han J, Mayo J, Xu X, Li J, Bringas P Jr, Maas RL, et al. (2009) Indirect modulation of Shh signaling by Dlx5 affects the oral-nasal patterning of palate and rescues cleft palate in Msx1-null mice. Development. 136: 4225–33. pmid:19934017
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lanner F, Rossant J. (2010) The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development. 137:3351–3360. pmid:20876656
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Bellmunt J, Teh BT, Tortora G, Rosenberg JE. (2013) Molecular targets on the horizon for kidney and urothelial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 10: 557–570. pmid:23982523
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Goetz R, Mohammadi M. (2013) Exploring mechanisms of FGF signalling through the lens of structural biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 14:166–180. pmid:23403721
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Chen J, Lan Y, Baek JA, Gao Y, Jiang RL. (2009) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling plays an essential role in activation of odontogenic mesenchyme during early tooth development. Dev Biol. 334:174–185. pmid:19631205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Lin C, Yin Y, Bell SM, Veith GM, Chen H, Huh SH, et al. (2013) Delineating a conserved genetic cassette promoting outgrowth of body appendages. PLoS Genet 9: e1003231 pmid:23358455
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. He F, Xiong W, Wang Y, Li L, Liu C, Yamagami T, et al.(2011) Epithelial Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates palatal shelf fusion through regulation of Tgfβ3 expression. Dev Biol. 350:511–519. pmid:21185284
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Ahn Y, Sanderson BW, Klein OD, Krumlauf R. (2010) Inhibition of Wnt signaling by Wise (Sostdc1) and negative feedback from Shh controls tooth number and patterning.Development. 137:3221–3231. pmid:20724449
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Soriano P. (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet. 21:70–71. pmid:9916792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y, Bringas P Jr, Han J, Rowitch DH, et al. (2000) Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127: 1671–1679. pmid:10725243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Presnell JK, Schreibman MP. (1997). Humason’s Animal Tissue Techniques. JohnHopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

[ref27] 27. Gu S, Wei N, Yu L, Fei J, Chen YP. (2008) Shox2-deficiency leads to dysplasia and ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint in mice. Mech Dev. 125:729–742. pmid:18514492
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Gu S, Wei N, Yu X, Jiang Y, Fei J, Chen YP. (2008) Mice with an anterior cleft of the palate survive neonatal lethality. Dev Dyn. 237:1509–1516. pmid:18393307
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Lan Y, Wang Q, Ovitt CE, Jiang RL. (2007) A unique mouse strain expressing Crerecombinase for tissue-specific analysis of gene function in palate and kidney development. Genesis. 45:618–624. pmid:17941042
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Zhou J, Gao Y, Lan Y, Jia S, Jiang RL (2013) Pax9 regulates a molecular network involving Bmp4, Fgf10, Shh signaling and the Osr2 transcription factor to control palate morphogenesis. Development. 140: 4709–4718. pmid:24173808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Xiong W, He F, Morikawa Y, Yu X, Zhang Z, Lan Y, et al. (2009) Hand2 is required in the epithelium for palatogenesis in mice. Dev Biol. 330:131–141. pmid:19341725
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Li J, Huang X, Xu X, Mayo J, Bringas P Jr, Jiang R, et al. (2011) SMAD4-mediated WNT signaling controls the fate of cranial neural crest cells during tooth morphogenesis. Development 138:1977–1989. pmid:21490069
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Gao Y, Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Jiang R. (2009) Functional equivalence of the zinc finger transcription factors Osr1 and Osr2 in mouse development. Dev Biol. 328:200–209. pmid:19389375
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Almaidhan A, Cesario J, Landin MA, Zhao Y, Sharma N, Choi V, et al. (2014) Neural crest- specific deletion of Ldb1 leads to cleft secondary palate with impaired palatal shelf elevation. BMC Dev Biol. 14:3. pmid:24433583
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Liu W, Lan Y, Pauws E, Meester-Smoor MA, Stanier P, Zwarthoff EC, et al. (2008) The Mn1 transcription factor acts upstream of Tbx22 and preferentially regulates posterior palate growth in mice. Development. 135: 3959–3968. pmid:18948418
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Enomoto H, Nelson CM, Somerville RP, Mielke K, Dixon LJ, Powell K, et al. (2010) Cooperation of two ADAMTS metalloproteases in closure of the mouse palate identifies a requirement for versican proteolysis in regulating palatal mesenchyme proliferation. Development. 137: 4029–4038. pmid:21041365
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Guo L, Degenstein L, Fuchs E. (1996) Keratinocyte growth factor is required for hair development but not for wound healing. Genes Dev. 10:165–175. pmid:8566750
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Zhang X, Ibrahimi OA, Olsen SK, Umemori H, Mohammadi M, Ornitz DM. (2006) Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family. J Biol Chem. 281:15694–15700. pmid:16597617
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Snyder-Warwick AK, Perlyn CA, Pan J, Yu K, Zhang L, Ornitz DM. (2010) Analysis of a gain-of-function FGFR2 Crouzon mutation provides evidence of loss of function activity in the etiology of cleft palate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.107: 2515–2520. pmid:20133659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Riley BM, Mansilla MA, Ma J, Daack-Hirsch S, Maher BS, Raffensperger LM, et al. (2007) Impaired FGF signaling contributes to cleft lip and palate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104: 4512–4517. pmid:17360555
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Wang C, Chang JY, Yang C, Huang Y, Liu J, You P, et al. (2013) Type 1 fibroblast growth factor receptor in cranial neural crest cell-derived mesenchyme is required for palatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 288:22174–22183. pmid:23754280
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Matsumura K, Taketomi T, Yoshizaki K, Arai S, Sanui T, Yoshiga D, et al. (2011) Sprouty2 controls proliferation of palate mesenchymal cells via fibroblast growth factor signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 404:1076–1082. pmid:21195053
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Mouse lines

X-gal staining and histological analysis

Cell proliferation assay

In situ hybridization analysis

Immunohistochemistry

Results

Cre activity was specifically distributed in the palatal mesenchyme of Osr2-creKI mouse

Over-expression of Fgf8 by Osr2-CreKI results in complete cleft palate

Abnormal cell proliferation in Osr2-CreKI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves

FGF8 had no direct effects on the Shh expression and cell proliferation in palatal epithelium

The altered gene expression in the Osr2-CreKI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme

The altered FGF signaling pathways inthe Osr2-CreKI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves

Discussion

Ectopic activation of Fgf8 results in increased cell proliferation and failure of elevation of palatal shelves

Reverse effects of ectopic FGF8 on the cell proliferation of palatal epithelium and mesenchyme

Differential FGF signaling pathways are involved in the cell proliferation and Fgf10 expression in palatal shelves

The altered gene expression along the mediolateral axis of the developing palate shelves

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Cre activity was specifically distributed in the palatal mesenchyme of Osr2-cre^KI mouse

Over-expression of Fgf8 by Osr2-Cre^KI results in complete cleft palate

Abnormal cell proliferation in Osr2-Cre^KI; Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves

The altered gene expression in the Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal mesenchyme

The altered FGF signaling pathways inthe Osr2-Cre^KI;Rosa26R-Fgf8 palatal shelves